Presence – data space
In Presence, Interaction and ‘data space’, Leggett writes of cultural perceptions about presence in the western world, adding that presence has a virtual implication and that it must be examined taking into consideration cultural meanings including those that point to a subject-object relation that connotes distance. His discussion of Plato’s Phaedrus regarding writing as a new form of communication is important, especially in respect to how Plato was using the new medium (writing) to discuss the old medium (orality). On that topic, Leggett continues by stating “as with any new device [new technology?] … comparing the efficacy of its use with the familiarity and pervasiveness of the old methods was a part of a gradual adoption and continuing adaptation during the transition from the old to the new.”
Is it possible then to infer that the reason so many of the ‘features’ of the old (or real world) are adapted in the new technologies? Is that the reason why the houses in Second Life tend to look like the ones we build and inhabit in the real world? Are we then adapting an old form in order to move forward into a new way of communicating and interacting?
How do we create meaning? Through the ‘absent present’ of Derrida quoted by Leggett? Could that also translate to the real – imaginary? magical – literal? When we create a virtual presence what meaning are we establishing between the interface and the physical? Can we blur the boundary and consider both as an interface? My hand as it writes is the conduct of my thoughts, and my mouse as it selects and picks is also part of this relation. (Am I getting too philosophical? ).
In any case, regarding his other discussion, models of interaction, I couldn’t help but think of the exhibit I had just seen at MOMA of Olafur Eliasson where there was an awareness of the art and your interactions with it, and of the physical environment and presence that was being experienced and reflected back. Literally reflected in one case, when you entered a ledge jutting out of the building encased with mirrors in which you saw your reflection multiplied ‘ad-infinitum.’ Needless to say I became a big fan.
And those are my reflections regarding presence, interaction and data space.
Explore posts in the same categories: presence





July 10th, 2008 at 11:49 pm
evolve, revolve
July 11th, 2008 at 12:14 am
more on presence
July 14th, 2008 at 12:34 pm
I just wanted to comment on the idea of space. I am very into film as an art form and am working on some stuff right now and I always try to imagine and feel what the creator has done for space. What I mean by this is how it is shot and how emotionally we are put in the restraint. The idea of space even when it’s not technically something we can be a part of makes people feel certain impulses. I just got done watching the film The Lives of Others where in the special features the writer/director talks about using actual machines that the GDR used and spaces that were a part of that time. The space made up on screen has made people who were in the GDR feel what it was once like in that situation. To me this is powerful.
July 15th, 2008 at 4:02 am
http://seesmic.com/v/UWFBfW1mfF
hey, i need help. I made a video but i don’t know how to post it here or embed it here. i also couldn’t figure out how to make my video private instead of showing it to the public. I will continue to search the help tutorials on Seesmic and here but if someone can give me some quick instruction, I would appreciate it.
July 15th, 2008 at 8:41 am
Hey Theresa – there are two ways to post/embed a seesmic video here.
1. you just have to click the ?Or add a Video Comment with seesmic? link (below). It lets you record/post a video comment right without having the leave the blog.
2. if you already recorded a video within seesmic and want to embed it here, just copy the embed code here (where it says “Code to embed video”).
There’s not really a way to make it private -if you vlog, then it’s out there -similar to blogging: if you blog, then it’s out there.