Harasim Reading
Tuesday, June 15th, 2010The Harasim article speaks of the expansion of elearning in the 80s and 90s. I am surprised that today elearning is not more widely recognized and accepted as a wonderful tool for education. Working in admissions for a university, prospective students are very skeptical as to what they could possibly learn online, believing that online education cannot be as good as in the classroom. In my masters program, many teachers are reluctant to teach online, and although more online classes are requested, the department still does not offer more, perhaps due to only a small demand, or no interested teachers. I find online education to be better suited for me, as I have more time to reflect on the learnings within my own time frame, and have the freedom to learn at my own pace. My first online class was an on campus/ online hybrid. The first few classes were on campus, then the course went online. The teacher taught the rest of the class from Germany, and it was taught through blackboard. Although I do not find blackboard to be the most effective online teaching platform, I have not used others.
I also found the section about a group of females beginning the online class to be interesting. Harasim says that individuals were responding the same regardless of their gender, and students that would normall not speak as much in class, worked harder through the online platform: Harasim says:
“Furthermore, it was always the same, small percentage of the class that spoke up. Even though these are technical courses there is a great deal of pragmatic content in many of the upper division and graduate courses that deal with design tradeoffs. We found that when every student had a chance
to reflect on their views and to compose their thoughts, the resulting
discussion was fairly equally distributed.”